Showing posts with label Temari. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Temari. Show all posts

Monday, July 2, 2012

Got a mind to, so here we see Temari and Ino from Naruto bound, gagged, blindfolded and stashed, patiently waiting for someone to find them because there's not much else they can do.  Naturally I'm posting it here because this picture would give too many other sites fits.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Another picture torpedoed by Deviant Art for "minor in a sexual situation".  It was an entry in another artist's contest. 

Yeah, I can see their point here.  I was pushing the boundaries of risque with this.  Even though you don't see anything, she is nude and she is underage in some societies.  And some societies are mature enough to accept that nudity isn't automatically a sexual situation and isn't necessarily bad, particularly if its voluntary nudity.

Of course, it was Temari and Temari seems to trigger the censors over there a lot.  I think Temari has been in more pictures I've had pulled than anyone else.
This picture lasted about a week on Deviant Art before it was struck down for violating "minors in a sexual situation".  Thing is, if you read the dialogue from Shikamaru (if you actually read), you can see he PUT them in that predicament to PREVENT A SEXUAL SITUATION.  Namely he was sick and tired of Temari and Ino fighting over him and he didn't want to deal with either one.  And how else do you get two trained ninjas to stop fighting?  You restrain them.

But obviously someone who equates restraint with rape just looked at the picture and went off.  I thought it was kind of a funny idea myself.

Monday, February 27, 2012

This picture was taken down from DeviantArt last month under the pretext of "a minor character in a sexual situation".   I'm still looking for the "sexual situation" part.  I suppose somebody could maybe possibly consider the fact that because her legs are tied doubled, it would somehow maybe make her .01% more likely to be sexually assaulted.  But that's REALLY grasping at straws. It seems more likely someone was searching for a reason to dump it and used the old Supreme Court pornography standard of "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it".  If you're going to use that logic, then every picture of a person in a submissive or indefensible position is a sexual situation, because the possibility of rape is there - - even if the person is alone in the picture.